The – all but – secret formula for productivity

Ever wondered why so many Lean initiatives derail?
22. November 2024

Last week, the Toyo­ta Manage­ment Insti­tu­te pre­sen­ted us with a for­mu­la for pro­duc­ti­vi­ty. Unsur­pri­sin­gly, it con­sists of two ele­ments, one of which is the sum of all the indi­vi­du­als in a team with their respec­ti­ve per­so­na­li­ties, skills and moti­va­ti­on. The second ele­ment is the degree of acti­ve col­la­bo­ra­ti­on, the team strengh, cal­led “alpha”.

In short, the out­put depends on the sum of the respec­ti­ve per­so­nal cha­rac­te­ristics times the degree of col­la­bo­ra­ti­on. So far, so simple.

I have now spent the last few days ope­ra­tio­na­li­zing the fac­tors included by com­bi­ning the for­mu­la with the ele­ments of Deci/Ryan’s moti­va­ti­on theo­ry, Isao Yoshino’s state­ments and the ide­as of Kono­suke Mat­su­s­hi­ta (Peo­p­le befo­re Pro­ducts). This results in the fol­lo­wing defi­ni­ti­ons and fac­tors, which I hope will help some peo­p­le to focus their efforts to impro­ve productivity.

A = Acqui­red Skills – This is the most obvious point. Any AI for head­hun­ters could poten­ti­al­ly assess this point.

P = Per­so­na­li­ty, which is quite clear, too, but the most important for pro­duc­ti­vi­ty from a Toyo­ta per­spec­ti­ve might be atti­tu­des and view­points, accoun­ta­bi­li­ty, fle­xi­bi­li­ty and the will to grow.

M = (indi­vi­du­al) moti­va­ti­on, which is pri­ma­ri­ly dri­ven by auto­no­my (in the sen­se of self-determined action) and com­pe­tence, wher­eby com­pe­tence is unders­tood as per­cei­ved com­pe­tence in the sen­se that the use of our abili­ties leads direct­ly to con­cre­te expe­ri­en­ces of success.

Now, lets move to the dif­fi­cult part, the „alpha“, the fac­tor that is easi­ly over­loo­ked. What could have an impact on how well and actively the mem­bers of a team work together?

Deci/Ryan cite our need to feel safe as part of the group as a key ele­ment of moti­va­ti­on. This, in turn, is likely fue­led by things like con­sis­tent beha­vi­or, the avai­la­bi­li­ty of help, equal tre­at­ment, and con­ti­nuous growth (or an authen­tic “no lay­off” policy).

A clear focus or com­mon goal also has a strong posi­ti­ve impact on col­la­bo­ra­ti­on by ensu­ring that ever­yo­ne is moving in the same direc­tion. It is also important that a team has a mixed com­po­si­ti­on so that a wide varie­ty of cha­rac­ters and skills are represented.

Even more than all the­se fac­tors, remem­be­red group com­pe­tence is of cru­cial importance. In the sen­se that the mem­bers of the group coll­ec­tively remem­ber the vic­to­ries they have achie­ved tog­e­ther and the app­re­cia­ti­on they have recei­ved for the­se successes.

To sum­ma­ri­ze, the­re are three main are­as of focus if we want to impro­ve pro­duc­ti­vi­ty or work results: Focu­sing recruit­ment on per­so­na­li­ty, ensu­ring the hig­hest pos­si­ble degree of auto­no­my of action and other­wi­se con­cen­t­ra­ting on fos­te­ring acti­ve collaboration.

So, whe­re­ver alpha seems to be a pro­blem (what is nowa­days rather the rule than an excep­ti­on), it might be hel­pful to check whe­ther ever­y­bo­dy is awa­re of and fol­lo­wing his (sub)goals. Whe­ther the per­cei­ved level of safe­ty can be increased. Whe­ther the­re are smart, opti­mi­stic, cou­ra­ge­ous, ener­ge­tic and new (!) peo­p­le in the team. And to crea­te oppor­tu­ni­ties and tasks through which peo­p­le can expe­ri­ence and achie­ve results tog­e­ther as well as streng­then their relationships.

 

Weitere Beiträge

    *Pflichtfelder